Retiree Info – 1114
AA vs AA Retirees 7.6.12
1114 Bankruptcy court update 8.8.12
Section 1114 Update – 2.17.13
(Retiree Benefits)
On January 23, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court heard argument on American’s motion for a partial summary judgment on the adversary complaint (lawsuit) that American filed against the Section 1114 Committee last July.
In that motion, American asked the Judge to rule, without even needing a trial, (for a summary determination that as a matter of law) that American is not contractually obligated to provide retiree benefits (health and life insurance) to its retirees. (Are the benefits “vested”?)
If the Court denies the motion for even one of the various groups of retirees, for example those who:
·    were members of a union,
·    retired under an early out program,
·    were former TWA employees, or
·    were hired prior to 1999 when American did not reserve the right to terminate retiree benefits,
then the Court will conduct a full trial and hear evidence on the vesting question. Following the January 23, 2013, argument on that motion, the Court took the matter under consideration and has not set a date for when it will rule.
The Court has not been asked at this time to address the other part of the adversary complaint which asks for a determination that the requirements of 11 U.S.C. 1114 do not apply in this case. Section 1114 restricts a debtor’s ability to terminate or modify retiree benefits unless the debtor can show, among other things, that it bargained in good faith with the Retiree Committee about the changes and that it has proposed only those changes necessary to permit it to reorganize. If the Court determines that Section 1114 does apply, which it could do even if it determines that some or all of the various retiree groups do not have vested benefits, American would not be able to modify or terminate retiree benefits without satisfying these requirements of Section 1114 and receiving a Bankruptcy Court Order allowing it to terminate or modify the benefits.
While these matters are pending in the Court, American continues to be legally obligated to provide retiree benefits. The just-announced proposed merger does not change American’s obligations to its retirees.
AmericanAirlines + US Airways
“On Our Way”Â
Patrick Hancock
APFA Retirement Specialis
Section 1114 Update – 10.5.12
On May 3, 2012, the United States Bankruptcy Court overseeing American Airlines chapter 11 bankruptcy case approved the appointment of a committee to represent all of American’s 40,000 plus retirees. Under Section 1114 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Committee’s role is to represent individuals who retired from American Airlines before November 29, 2011 with respect to their medical, dental and life insurance benefits. American Airlines has indicated that it wants to expand the size of the Section 1114-protected group to include individuals who retire prior to November 1, 2012. Section 1114 establishes certain procedures that a debtor in bankruptcy, like American Airlines, must follow before it changes or eliminates the medical and life benefits it provides to its retirees. Section 1114 also recognizes that if benefits are changed or eliminated, retirees would have a claim against American Airlines for the value of the benefits that are lost.
On July 6, 2012, American Airlines filed suit against its retirees, asking the Court to declare that it has the right to unilaterally take away the medical and life insurance benefits that retirees earned when they worked for American Airlines. On August 15, 2012, American Airlines filed a motion for partial summary judgment in that case, asking the Bankruptcy Court to rule that none of the American Airlines retirees has a “vested right” to the medical and life insurance benefits currently provided by American Airlines. American Airlines has stated that it is advancing this motion solely for purposes of determining whether the retirees will have a claim against American Airlines for damages if retiree benefits are terminated or changed.  American Airlines has not asked the Court to find that American Airlines can terminate these benefits without going through the Section 1114 process and has stated that it will comply with Section 1114 before it changes retiree benefits.  Section 1114 requires American Airlines to negotiate in good faith with the Retiree Committee about changes to the retiree benefits and prove, among other things, that changes to retiree benefits are necessary to permit American Airlines to reorganize, that it is fair and equitable to change retiree benefits and that the Retiree Committee’s decision not to agree to the proposed modifications is made without good cause. The Retiree Committee intends to oppose this summary judgment motion and will file its written response on November 9, 2012.  The Court will hear argument on the motion in late December or early January. Our expectation is that the Bankruptcy Court will reject American Airlines’ summary judgment motion and find that the retiree benefits are in fact vested.  If the motion is denied, the matter will be set for trial thereafter.
Currently, the Retiree Committee is in the process of obtaining information from American Airlines, both through the discovery process and informally, to defend against American Airlines’ lawsuit and to understand American Airlines’ position on the continuation of retiree benefits. The Retiree Committee also has met and will continue to meet with American Airlines in an effort to resolve the dispute over continued retiree benefits.
In the meantime, American Airlines is still providing medical and life insurance benefits to its retirees and has told the Committee through counsel that it will continue to do so until this litigation and the Section 1114 process are resolved.